All the simulations below assume a 1-mm diameter beam spot. The width of the Q-value distributions is actually quite sensitive to beam spot size. I won't taunt you by showing plots of what the resolution would look like if the beam were on axis, but here's what the two states in 18O look like for a 2-mm diameter beam spot:
The widths of the peaks are now 63 keV instead of 51 keV for the 1 mm diameter beam spot, so worse but not catastrophic.
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
April
(22)
- more E1031 results
- E1031 contaminant results
- E1031 contaminant joy
- Orsay: elastic scattering efficiency
- yet another comment on Orsay: beam spot size
- further note on the Orsay sims: threshold and "goo...
- details of Orsay Q-value calculation
- more on contaminants
- Preliminary contaminant results: Orsay
- Orsay results: effect of target thickness and Q ca...
- Orsay: srimulations and Ex + Jpi
- new blog template!
- note about S2s in E1031
- E1031 alpha calibration
- dirty secrets about absorber thickness
- note to self: backward angles
- acronym JOY
- TRIUMF 12C+12C simulation results: target thicknes...
- SRIMulation JOY! (mostly for E1031 but possibly ge...
- simulations for 12C+12C TRIUMF experiment
- Orsay detector geometry
- The dead layer gospel
-
▼
April
(22)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment