...with more levels and with 20Ne:
It looks like the kinematics will let us separate out the 16O reaction products, so they shouldn't be a problem for the Q-value calculation, and there are no natural-parity levels in 19O between the 5.7046 and 6.1196 MeV levels that were simulated--and those ones give Q values just to either side of the 6.404 MeV 18O peak of interest, so the 13C contamination shouldn't be a problem either.
woohoo!
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
April
(22)
- more E1031 results
- E1031 contaminant results
- E1031 contaminant joy
- Orsay: elastic scattering efficiency
- yet another comment on Orsay: beam spot size
- further note on the Orsay sims: threshold and "goo...
- details of Orsay Q-value calculation
- more on contaminants
- Preliminary contaminant results: Orsay
- Orsay results: effect of target thickness and Q ca...
- Orsay: srimulations and Ex + Jpi
- new blog template!
- note about S2s in E1031
- E1031 alpha calibration
- dirty secrets about absorber thickness
- note to self: backward angles
- acronym JOY
- TRIUMF 12C+12C simulation results: target thicknes...
- SRIMulation JOY! (mostly for E1031 but possibly ge...
- simulations for 12C+12C TRIUMF experiment
- Orsay detector geometry
- The dead layer gospel
-
▼
April
(22)
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment