--make sure energy loss calculations use the angle through the material, not the angle in the lab. This was correct in the target for the most recent batch of triumf sims but incorrect for the upstream LEDA deadlayer calculation.
Tomas el Sabio would never make a mistake like that.
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
April
(22)
- more E1031 results
- E1031 contaminant results
- E1031 contaminant joy
- Orsay: elastic scattering efficiency
- yet another comment on Orsay: beam spot size
- further note on the Orsay sims: threshold and "goo...
- details of Orsay Q-value calculation
- more on contaminants
- Preliminary contaminant results: Orsay
- Orsay results: effect of target thickness and Q ca...
- Orsay: srimulations and Ex + Jpi
- new blog template!
- note about S2s in E1031
- E1031 alpha calibration
- dirty secrets about absorber thickness
- note to self: backward angles
- acronym JOY
- TRIUMF 12C+12C simulation results: target thicknes...
- SRIMulation JOY! (mostly for E1031 but possibly ge...
- simulations for 12C+12C TRIUMF experiment
- Orsay detector geometry
- The dead layer gospel
-
▼
April
(22)
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment