Angular distributions of reaction protons and alphas, for last july's set-up:
energy distribution for alphas from ground state of 20Ne:
...and for Ex=5.618 MeV:
What those energy distributions suggest is that it doesn't affect the energy resolution if we use 20 ug/cm2 targets instead of 10 ug; also that the beam spot size isn't something to worry about. (these simulations don't take into account the incoming angle of the beam, which would be worsened by making the spot size smaller.)
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
April
(22)
- more E1031 results
- E1031 contaminant results
- E1031 contaminant joy
- Orsay: elastic scattering efficiency
- yet another comment on Orsay: beam spot size
- further note on the Orsay sims: threshold and "goo...
- details of Orsay Q-value calculation
- more on contaminants
- Preliminary contaminant results: Orsay
- Orsay results: effect of target thickness and Q ca...
- Orsay: srimulations and Ex + Jpi
- new blog template!
- note about S2s in E1031
- E1031 alpha calibration
- dirty secrets about absorber thickness
- note to self: backward angles
- acronym JOY
- TRIUMF 12C+12C simulation results: target thicknes...
- SRIMulation JOY! (mostly for E1031 but possibly ge...
- simulations for 12C+12C TRIUMF experiment
- Orsay detector geometry
- The dead layer gospel
-
▼
April
(22)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment