data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4924a/4924a43c94cefe20c22820c070742b036c1af571" alt=""
energy distribution for alphas from ground state of 20Ne:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e3a5/7e3a5c6305fee7aecca322c39669301649f3ac3b" alt=""
...and for Ex=5.618 MeV:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3bd7/d3bd77e6c78200b5e4db6ab7d4c5fdecc8198f9e" alt=""
What those energy distributions suggest is that it doesn't affect the energy resolution if we use 20 ug/cm2 targets instead of 10 ug; also that the beam spot size isn't something to worry about. (these simulations don't take into account the incoming angle of the beam, which would be worsened by making the spot size smaller.)
No comments:
Post a Comment