Although we don't have LEDAs to burn, we do have S2s, apparently. Try those: at 55 and 190 mm from the target they cover 3.3-32.5' with really high efficiency. The hit pattern is shown below...
...and the angular distribution of 18O and α hits:
Compare these to the hit patterns and ang dists of one arrangement of 6 ps3ds:
Advantages of using S2s instead of PS3Ds: Lots of coverage; easy analysis; Q value no less precise; fewer channels of electronics; fewer detectors to fry.
Disadvantages: we have to scramble for pre-amps and cabling and such; and we don't get to use the Deep Space Nine mount.
Thoughts?
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
May
(13)
- Orsay: detector configuration: reality intervenes
- by special request: 21Na(p,α)18Ne
- 17O (p,α) proposal
- Orsay: cross sections for various beam energies us...
- Orsay: trying to not fry the detectors
- Orsay: how to predict detector damage?
- Orsay: detector configurations AGAIN
- Orsay: Deep Space 9 mount for PS3Ds
- Orsay: energy considerations for S2s
- Orsay: trying out S2 detectors
- Orsay: Why are we using position-sensitive strip d...
- Orsay: angular distributions for different species
- Orsay: take out delta-E detectors: resulting Q-val...
-
▼
May
(13)
Monday, May 08, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment