I blatantly ripped off Kelly's input file for 14C(12C,8Be): I changed only the order of the target and ejectile parameters in the 7th line--I may have left something out. Assuming that everything's okay, the results are encouraging: the peak of the total cross section is still at a beam energy of 80 MeV.
The angular distribution loooks different now. I don't think Kelly's results had a minimum at 25 MeV, and I also remember there being a couple of orders of magnitude difference between max and min....
Am I doing something wrong?
I don't have techno-fear--I have techno JOY!!! --Eddie Izzard.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(59)
-
▼
May
(13)
- Orsay: detector configuration: reality intervenes
- by special request: 21Na(p,α)18Ne
- 17O (p,α) proposal
- Orsay: cross sections for various beam energies us...
- Orsay: trying to not fry the detectors
- Orsay: how to predict detector damage?
- Orsay: detector configurations AGAIN
- Orsay: Deep Space 9 mount for PS3Ds
- Orsay: energy considerations for S2s
- Orsay: trying out S2 detectors
- Orsay: Why are we using position-sensitive strip d...
- Orsay: angular distributions for different species
- Orsay: take out delta-E detectors: resulting Q-val...
-
▼
May
(13)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment